It’s never easy when it comes to create Game Fight articles that bring EA Sports and Konami . In addition both are able to perform very well with their respective advantages, both FIFA and PES has a rabid fan base.In the article FIFA 15 vs Pro Evolution Soccer 2015 last year, the first name called a winner with a score of very thin difference. License determines who is more deserving of the throne. But, what about this year? To judge which one is the best, we have also selected some elements or key points of a football simulation game for consideration, which largely remains the same as the points that we used in the previous article.
As is known, both FIFA 16 and PES 2016 looks equally charming. FIFA still maintain what they have achieved in the previous game. Various details of a football game does not go unnoticed, for example grass field, a splash of water, the texture of the audience, to the other elements on the sidelines.
PES 2016 too. Konami further optimize the Fox Engine’s ability to produce a better visual. Glance also just enhance the visual of the previous game. However, if observed, Konami now displays sharp textures audience. The face looks more like a star player is also further enhanced by a more visible expression ‘like a man’. Moreover, one thing we always liked since PES 2015 is a very good lighting effects.
Which makes PES 2016 is superior, physics effects and animations displayed appears very smooth and realistic. Conversely, in some scenes FIFA 16 still often look stiff. Plus, EA Sports also decided to eliminate the cut scene when the players enter the field. Therefore, to point this one we give to PES 2016.
Not much has changed from FIFA 16. In fact, as far as we play it, the gameplay is very similar to FIFA 15. Indeed, there is an improvement in terms of AI, but you still will find movements that are not perfect or collisions between players who seem strange ,
In contrast, PES 2016 gameplay it offers that we think are better than the previous game. You will see a movement so natural and realistic. interaction with the ball also appears much more dynamic.
With gameplay that ‘balance’, makes anyone feel comfortable and fun when playing against a friend or the computer without having to master the skill or strategy that complicated. AI more intelligent when attack and defense, and is able to adapt to suit the game.
With various advantages, we again gave one point for PES 2016.
As we’ve mentioned in previous articles, audio quality becomes a very important factor for a football game. Feel the atmosphere of a match or not is determined by how serious developer working on this one point.
Konami was left to the affairs of this one. Less lively atmosphere of the stadium, and the yells of the audience does not feel jarring. Although trying to bring a new commentator named Peter Drury, proved PES 2016 has not been able to bring the atmosphere of the game more exciting. His problem is still the same, a sentence which is less varied, less relevant, and if you listen carefully, many sentences are actually similar to those often spoken Jon Champion.
Instead, FIFA 16 offers an authentic stadium atmosphere with yells peculiar to each team. Not only in the Barclays Premier League, the stadium atmosphere in other leagues, too, for example in the Bundesliga. Commentator Martin Tyler and Alan Smith was still able to revive the spirit. To Sounds, FIFA 16 is still superior.
Players resemblance to the original
We always separate the core points of the visual because of the similarity of players in the game with real players in the real world is not just a matter of face. Movements such as how to run, how to kick a ball, celebration, and others should be considered.
EA Sports polish appearance so few star players appear more similar to the original, even down to the tattoo on the body. Nothing seems more similar, but there are still many who do not. In addition, it still looks less proportional body shape and movements of the authentic is not too pronounced.
By contrast, in PES 2016, further optimization of the Fox Engine is capable of producing animated outstanding player. Also looks more delicate texture. Shape of the face, body, until the typical movements of certain players feel more real in this game. Neymar became one of the stars gridiron made very similar to the original. Great Job, Konami!
No doubt, we give points for PES 2016.
Both FIFA 16 and PES 2016 did not change significantly compared to the previous series. Of which are easy to see at a glance the eye, FIFA only adds new features, such as women’s soccer. In gameplay and visuals, more or less still the same.
While PES 2016 is to optimize the Fox Engine. The result can be seen from the player’s movements are more subtle and natural to the effects of physics are realistic, texture viewers better visualization of the stadium more detail, until the availability of features brand-new like Celebration Control, dynamic weather, dynamic wide camera angle, commentator new and Goal Keeper ID. For that, we give these points one at PES 2016.
And The Winner is: PES 2016!
Finally we arrive at a final conclusion. Not as heavy as last year was, where both games are equally present something that is hard to miss. Since it was first played FIFA 16 and PES 2016, we already felt GameFight winners this year will fall into the hands of Konami’s games filmed.
What PES 2016 looks more lucrative offer with a variety of improvements and the provision of new features here and there. In contrast to FIFA 16 which we think was ‘plateaued’ and not much improvement compared to last year’s game, other than a matter of women’s soccer.
But all of that back to your choice as a gamer. Remain faithful to support one or more open-minded and try to play both of them to compare themselves. If you have a different view, Feel free to comment and share your opinion!